On this case, Philadelphia Federal Decide Baylson reiterates:
- Claims for breach of an insurance coverage contract don’t enable for restoration of lawyer’s charges; reasonably, lawyer’s charges on this context are solely permitted underneath the Dangerous Religion Statute.
- Widespread regulation breach of an insurance coverage contract claims don’t enable for punitive damages; reasonably, punitive damages on this context are solely permitted underneath the Dangerous Religion Statute.
- The Dangerous Religion Statute doesn’t present for restoration of compensatory damages.
Date of Determination: April 29, 2022
Collings v. State Farm Hearth & Casualty Co., U.S. District Court docket Japanese District Pennsylvania No. 2:22-CV-0057, 2022 WL 1291511 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2022) (Baylson, J.)